May 31

310674

. Beedocs is an interesting and simple application designed to create "timelines." This software is primarily a teaching tool that can be used in presentations, classes, events and exhibitions.

In a very simple, Beedocs helps us to organize events with dates and images are automatically sorted in a visual timeline, interactive and animated 3D effect.

. It also allows export to broadcast formats, and even uncompressed with alpha channel.

Here is the real value in professional video editors and visual. In a simple way could be to compose an informative video layer and enough current design, which used in combination with other composition software, we can easily serve to illustrate documentaries and other audiovisual format l. In short it can serve to organize information in a very visual and attractive then we can "decorate" with other layers in After Effects or other compositing software.

You may download a trial version which gives an idea of what software can do. The videos available on their website are fairly representative of what can be done with this software.

At the moment there is only for Mac and its price is about $ 65.

May 27

Canon has listened to repeated requests from its users about the lack of manual controls in the HD video mode of the 5D MarkII popular and has finally developed a new firmware to unlock these features.

Due to popular demand is now possible to change the aperture, the ISO and speed in video mode, although the frame rate is still 30fps, though users also claim a frame rate of 24fps.

The firmware will be available for free download on the official website of Canon from June 2.

This provides food for thought to what extent the brand play with users, to what extent are "castrated" the products we buy and if when we change our cameras by top models, we are actually buying back the same camera we had with just a firmware again.

Hidden somewhere in the 5D, sleep a variable framerate Canon currently does not want to wake up.

270509

May 23

The controversial and confusing topic of the pixel aspect ratio , discussed earlier in this blog, seems to keep to complicated.
In the new version of After Effects CS4, Adobe has changed the proportions of some of its settings in composition, since the sizes used during the nine previous versions of After Effects seems, according to Adobe's own admission, they were "slightly inaccurate" .

Now, if we work on PAL square pixels, we set the compositions in the following frame sizes:

  • 4:3 square pixels (PAL D1/DV): 788 × 576 (formerly 768 × 576)
  • 16:9 square pixels (PAL D1/DV): 1050 × 576 (previously 1024 x 576)
    230509

These proportions go to recalculate the dimensions of the box and reinterpret PAL analog to digital, taking into account the so-called "clean aperture", which is the name given to the overall size of the box counting PAL analog lines that do not carry picture information. According to recommendations of the BBC, which are those that have led to Adobe tiing a bit more with the theme, the calculations to arrive at these sizes would be:

  • , aplicando una regla de tres lo deducimos: (576×4)/3=768 There is a measure which is always unchanged: an image 576 pixels PAL is always horizontal (digital equivalent of the 625 analog) 576 horizontal pixels in a 4:3 ratio, providing 768 vertical pixels by applying a rule of thumb we deduce: (576 × 4) / 3 = 768
  • The TV pixels are not square but rectangular in PAR ratio of 1:1094, therefore: 768 / 1.094 = 702. That is, an image is actually analog PAL 702 × 576 rectangular pixels. ¿?
  • Where are los18 missing pixels to 720 × 576 which we all use?. These 18 pixels are equivalent to the two side black bars (of 9 pixels each) that we always observed that digitized PAL video. This is called "clean aperture", ie including the full PAL image signal lines that carry picture information. , es decir exclusivamente las líneas que llevan información de imagen. Within this "clean aperture" or fully open, is the proportion of 702 × 576 pixels of which we spoke earlier, that is called "production aperture", ie only the lines that carry picture information. But digital should be used fully open and all its pixels, watching these 18 pixels as safety margins, or 720 pixels (702 +18) rectangular.
  • One more thing, if those 18 pixels are rectangular what if they are converted to square pixels? Let's see them doing the reverse: 18 × 1.094 = 20. 20 square pixels, 768 pixels added to the square of which we set equal to 788 × 576. Here are the new dimensions that proposes Adobe After Effects.
  • : (18 x 4)/ 3 = 24 pixels rectangulares que equivalen a 24 x 1,094 = 26 cuadrados . In a ratio of 16:9, those 18 pixels rectangular pixels are converted into 26 squares (18 x 4) / 3 = 24 equivalent rectangular pixels to 24 x 1.094 = 26 square. They added 26 pixels to 1024 pixels which had previously assumed PAL 16:9 gives us: 1024 +26 = 1050 × 576 square pixels, which are the correct dimensions to compose a digital image in 16:9 PAL square pixels! !

But many laps and marearnos with these conversions, it is true that we have to assume that the new box sizes proposed Adobe, taught by the BBC, are correct and in theory we should use so that the proportions of graphs and images appear properly when converting PAL.

More information: